Puzzle Test Improves Performance in Children with Intellectual Disabilities
Author Information
Author(s): Katrina D. Bello, Nahal Goharpey, Sheila G. Crewther, David P. Crewther
Primary Institution: Swinburne University, La Trobe University
Hypothesis
Children with severe intellectual disabilities will perform better on a puzzle form of the Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices than on the book form.
Conclusion
The puzzle form of the RCPM is a more reliable measure of non-verbal reasoning in children with severe intellectual disabilities compared to the book form.
Supporting Evidence
- The puzzle form showed a significantly higher performance and completion rate for children with severe ID compared to the book form.
- Typically developing children performed similarly on both the puzzle and book forms.
- The puzzle form was designed to engage sensory attention and limit distractions.
Takeaway
Kids with severe intellectual disabilities can do better on a puzzle test than a regular book test because the puzzle is more fun and easier for them to understand.
Methodology
The study involved two parts: one tested typically developing children on both forms of the RCPM, and the other tested children with severe ID on the puzzle and book forms.
Limitations
Some participants were excluded for not completing the minimum number of items, which may affect the generalizability of the results.
Participant Demographics
Participants included 164 children with severe intellectual disabilities, including those with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Down Syndrome, aged between 5 and 11 years.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website