Pandemic influenza preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-making
2006

Ethical Framework for Pandemic Influenza Planning

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Alison K Thompson, Karen Faith, Jennifer L Gibson, Ross EG Upshur

Primary Institution: Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital

Hypothesis

How can an ethical framework guide decision-making in pandemic influenza planning?

Conclusion

An ethical framework can improve decision-making processes during a pandemic by incorporating ethical values and stakeholder engagement.

Supporting Evidence

  • Ethical frameworks can help mitigate collateral damage during a pandemic.
  • Stakeholder engagement is essential for the legitimacy of the ethical framework.
  • The framework includes both procedural and substantive ethical values.

Takeaway

When preparing for a flu pandemic, hospitals need to think about fairness and ethics, not just science, to make better decisions.

Methodology

The framework was developed through stakeholder engagement and incorporates clinical, organizational, and public health ethics.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the lack of diverse stakeholder input, particularly from patients and families.

Limitations

The framework has not yet been vetted by direct patient and family representatives.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6939-7-12

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication