Evaluating Teaching Qualities of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty
Author Information
Author(s): van der Leeuw Renée, Lombarts Kiki, Heineman Maas Jan, Arah Onyebuchi
Primary Institution: Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
Hypothesis
The study aims to validate two instruments for measuring the teaching qualities of obstetrics and gynecology faculty.
Conclusion
The SETQ instruments were found to be reliable and valid for evaluating the teaching qualities of obstetrics and gynecology faculty.
Supporting Evidence
- The study achieved high response rates of 85.7% for residents and 86.8% for faculty.
- Factor analysis revealed five scales with high reliability for both residents and faculty.
- Four to six residents' evaluations are needed per faculty for reliable assessments.
Takeaway
This study shows that we can use special tools to help teachers in obstetrics and gynecology improve their teaching skills based on feedback from their students.
Methodology
A cross-sectional multi-center questionnaire study involving residents and faculty from various teaching hospitals in the Netherlands.
Potential Biases
Residents may fear repercussions for providing negative feedback, potentially affecting the honesty of evaluations.
Limitations
The study's findings may not be generalizable beyond the specific context of obstetrics and gynecology faculty in the Netherlands.
Participant Demographics
66 residents and 99 faculty, with 66.2% of residents and 50.5% of faculty being female.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.01
Statistical Significance
p<0.01
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website