Comparative effects of ciprofol and propofol on perioperative outcomes
Author Information
Author(s): Qi Jiazheng, Zhang Lingjing, Meng Fanhua, Yang Xiaoyu, Chen Baoxuan, Gao Lingqi, Zhao Xu, Luo Mengqiang
Primary Institution: Fudan University, Huashan Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai, China
Hypothesis
Does ciprofol have advantages over propofol for sedation, particularly concerning respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes?
Conclusion
Ciprofol may be more effective than propofol in minimizing perioperative respiratory adverse events and maintaining hemodynamic stability during sedation without prolonging recovery time.
Supporting Evidence
- Ciprofol resulted in fewer adverse respiratory events than propofol.
- Ciprofol showed a lower incidence of injection pain compared to propofol.
- Ciprofol reduced intraoperative hypotension compared to propofol.
- Ciprofol led to lower nausea and vomiting rates than propofol.
- No significant differences were observed for hypertension or bradycardia.
Takeaway
Ciprofol is a new medicine that might be better than propofol for keeping patients safe and comfortable during surgeries.
Methodology
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous ciprofol and propofol for sedation.
Potential Biases
High risk of bias in many included studies, particularly regarding blinding and reporting.
Limitations
Most studies had a high risk of bias, limiting the quality of evidence and generalizability of findings.
Participant Demographics
Included studies primarily involved patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p < 0.001
Confidence Interval
95% CI 0.35–0.55
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website