Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: Oncologic Outcomes and Management of Distal Ureter; Review of the Literature
2009

Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: Outcomes and Management

Sample size: 116 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Andre Berger, Amr Fergany

Primary Institution: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urological Institute

Hypothesis

What are the oncologic outcomes and management techniques for distal ureter in laparoscopic nephroureterectomy?

Conclusion

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy shows promising intermediate and long-term oncologic outcomes similar to open surgery, but the management of the distal ureter remains controversial.

Supporting Evidence

  • Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy has been shown to have superior perioperative outcomes compared to open surgery.
  • Intermediate term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy are comparable to open nephroureterectomy.
  • Initial long-term oncologic outcomes for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy are encouraging.

Takeaway

Doctors are using a special surgery called laparoscopic nephroureterectomy to remove tumors from the kidney and ureter, and it seems to work just as well as the older method.

Methodology

A comprehensive review of literature on oncological outcomes and management techniques for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy was conducted.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the variability in surgical techniques and patient selection.

Limitations

Many studies lack long-term follow-up and large sample sizes.

Participant Demographics

Patients with upper tract transitional cell carcinoma, typically older than 60.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1155/2009/826725

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication