Endoscopists attitudes on the publication of 'quality' data for endoscopic procedures: a cross-sectional survey
2007

Endoscopists' Attitudes on Quality Data Publication

Sample size: 132 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Hearnshaw Sarah A, Maddock Helena M, Nylander David, Prince Martin I

Primary Institution: NHS Blood and Transplant, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

Hypothesis

What are endoscopists' attitudes towards the publication of quality data for endoscopic procedures?

Conclusion

Most endoscopists collect quality data for their practice, but these are not widely available to the public.

Supporting Evidence

  • 78% of doctors responded to the survey.
  • 75% of respondents collect some form of quality data.
  • Only one respondent allowed public access to their data.

Takeaway

Doctors who perform endoscopy mostly keep track of their performance data, but they don't share it with patients or the public.

Methodology

A cross-sectional survey using a questionnaire sent to consultant gastrointestinal surgeons and physicians in the Northern region.

Potential Biases

Potential responder bias due to high response rate from those interested in the topic.

Limitations

The questionnaire was not validated or piloted.

Participant Demographics

103 respondents, including 40 consultant surgeons, 39 consultant physicians, and 22 registrars.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-230X-7-30

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication