Comparing Iron Fortification and Supplementation in Vietnamese Schoolchildren
Author Information
Author(s): Thi Le Huong, Brouwer Inge D, Burema Jan, Nguyen Khan Cong, Kok Frans J
Primary Institution: Hanoi Medical University
Hypothesis
The study aims to compare the efficacy of iron fortification versus iron supplementation on anaemia and iron status in schoolchildren.
Conclusion
Iron fortification is about half as effective as iron supplementation in reducing anaemia and improving iron status among anaemic children.
Supporting Evidence
- Iron fortification improved haemoglobin levels by 42% compared to iron supplementation.
- The prevalence of anaemia dropped significantly in both intervention groups.
- Children receiving iron supplementation showed a greater increase in serum ferritin levels.
Takeaway
This study found that giving iron-fortified noodles helps kids with low iron, but taking iron pills works better.
Methodology
A randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing iron-fortified noodles and iron supplementation over six months.
Potential Biases
Randomization was conducted by an independent researcher to minimize bias.
Limitations
The study may not apply to populations with different levels of iron deficiency or compliance.
Participant Demographics
Anaemic children aged 6-9 years from six primary schools in rural Vietnam.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.001
Confidence Interval
95% CI
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website