Development of the conceptual framework for the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ©) in glaucoma using a qualitative study
2007

Development of the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire for Glaucoma

Sample size: 15 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Nordmann Jean-Philippe, Denis Philippe, Vigneux Marc, Trudeau Elyse, Guillemin Isabelle, Berdeaux Gilles

Primary Institution: Hôpital des XV XX, Paris, France

Hypothesis

The study aimed to develop a questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction and compliance with eye-drop treatment in glaucoma patients.

Conclusion

The Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ) was developed to evaluate patient satisfaction and compliance with eye-drop treatment, helping to identify patients at risk of non-compliance.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patient satisfaction is a key driver of compliance with glaucoma treatment.
  • The questionnaire was developed based on interviews with patients and clinicians.
  • Six major concepts related to patient satisfaction and compliance were identified.
  • Patients expressed difficulties in self-administering eye drops.
  • Fear of blindness was a significant concern among patients.
  • Good communication with clinicians was linked to better patient compliance.
  • Patients' knowledge about their condition influenced their treatment adherence.
  • Travel and routine changes were barriers to medication compliance.

Takeaway

The researchers created a questionnaire to help doctors understand how happy patients are with their eye drops and if they are using them correctly.

Methodology

A qualitative study involving structured interviews with 15 patients and clinicians to develop and refine the questionnaire.

Potential Biases

Potential bias from translation of patient responses from French to English.

Limitations

The study may not have reached saturation in interviews, and translation of verbatim responses could introduce bias.

Participant Demographics

Patients aged 50-75, with 7 diagnosed with ocular hypertension and 8 with primary open-angle glaucoma; 8 males and 7 females.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-7-124

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication