Effect of Cyclic Loading on Microgap in Short vs Standard Implants
Author Information
Author(s): Gholamreza Esfahanizadeh, Ezatollah Jalalian, Seyyede Niloufar Salehi, Mahsa Ghasemi, Shaghayegh Golalipour
Primary Institution: Tehran Medical Sciences of Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Hypothesis
Cyclic loading will not significantly affect the microgap between short and standard implants.
Conclusion
Cyclic loading increased the microgap in both implant types, but the difference was not significant.
Supporting Evidence
- The mean microgap increased in both implant types after cyclic loading.
- No significant difference in microgap was found between short and standard implants.
- The study used a sample size of 20 implants, 10 short and 10 standard.
Takeaway
This study looked at how putting pressure on dental implants affects the tiny gaps where the implant meets the abutment, finding that both short and standard implants had similar results.
Methodology
In vitro study comparing microgap in short and standard implants under cyclic loading.
Limitations
Only one implant system was assessed, and the study did not simulate other types of loads or assess different lengths of short implants.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p=0.222
Statistical Significance
p=0.222
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website