Analysis of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match Results: 2016 to 2022
2024

Analysis of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match Results: 2016 to 2022

Sample size: 5617 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Muacevic Alexander, Adler John R, de Araujo Olivia B, O'Connell Daniel J, Allen Austin J, Mitchell Stuart L

Primary Institution: University of Miami, Miami, USA

Hypothesis

This study sought to analyse the trends among matched orthopaedic surgery applicants to clarify how medical students can best prepare for and assess their chances of a successful orthopaedic residency match.

Conclusion

Applicants who possess higher Step 1 and 2 scores, are AOA members, US MD applicants, and have a rank ≥11 in orthopaedic programs are more likely to successfully match.

Supporting Evidence

  • Step 1 score >250 was associated with increased chance of matching.
  • Being a US MD applicant increased the probability of matching.
  • Ranking ≥11 contiguous programs was linked to a higher match rate.
  • Five to 10 research experiences improved match chances.
  • Five to 15 publications were associated with a higher probability of matching.
  • Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) membership significantly increased match probability.

Takeaway

To get into an orthopaedic surgery residency, students should aim for high test scores, get involved in research, and rank many programs.

Methodology

Data was gathered from the NRMP Interactive Charting Outcomes in the Match tool and analyzed using risk difference and two-tailed p-values.

Potential Biases

The analysis is based on publicly available data, which may not capture all relevant applicant characteristics.

Limitations

The study could not analyze differences between gender or ethnicity, and it may not include all applicants due to opt-out rates.

Participant Demographics

The study included matched and unmatched orthopaedic surgery applicants from 2016 to 2022.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.001

Confidence Interval

95%

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.7759/cureus.75203

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication