Effect of remote ischemic conditioning on atrial fibrillation and outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (RICO-trial)
2011

Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Atrial Fibrillation After Heart Surgery

Sample size: 660 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Daniel Brevoord, Markus W. Hollmann, Stefan G. De Hert, Eric HPA van Dongen, Bram G. Heijnen, Anton de Bruin, Noortje Tolenaar, Wolfgang S. Schlack, Nina C. Weber, Marcel GW Dijkgraaf, Joris R. de Groot, Bas AJM de Mol, Antoine HG Driessen, Mona Momeni, Patrick Wouters, Stefaan Bouchez, Jan Hofland, Christan Lüthen, Tanja A. Meijer-Treschan, Benedikt H. Pannen, Ben Preckel

Primary Institution: Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Hypothesis

Remote ischemic pre- and/or post-conditioning reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass grafting and improve patient outcomes.

Conclusion

The study aims to determine if remote ischemic conditioning can reduce complications and improve outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Supporting Evidence

  • Remote ischemic conditioning may protect the heart from damage during surgery.
  • Atrial fibrillation is a common complication after heart surgery.
  • Reducing atrial fibrillation can improve patient outcomes.
  • Previous studies suggest remote ischemic conditioning reduces myocardial damage.
  • The study is designed to be randomized and controlled to ensure reliability.
  • Patients will be monitored for atrial fibrillation using Holter monitors.
  • Statistical analysis will be performed to assess the effectiveness of the interventions.
  • Ethical approval has been obtained for the study.

Takeaway

This study is looking at whether a simple procedure that temporarily cuts off blood flow to an arm can help prevent heart problems after heart surgery.

Methodology

A randomized controlled trial with four groups: control, remote ischemic preconditioning, remote ischemic postconditioning, and both.

Potential Biases

Local investigators are not blinded to treatment allocation, which may introduce bias.

Limitations

The study may not account for all variables affecting outcomes, and the results may not be generalizable to all patient populations.

Participant Demographics

Patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery, aged over 18, without prior cardiac surgery or certain medical conditions.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2253-11-11

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication