RASSF1A hypermethylation in pretreatment serum DNA of neuroblastoma patients: a prognostic marker
2009

RASSF1A Methylation in Neuroblastoma Patients' Serum

Sample size: 68 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Misawa A, Tanaka S, Yagyu S, Tsuchiya K, Iehara T, Sugimoto T, Hosoi H

Primary Institution: Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine

Hypothesis

Is RASSF1A hypermethylation in serum DNA a prognostic marker for neuroblastoma patients?

Conclusion

The methylation status of RASSF1A in serum has the potential to be a prognostic predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma patients.

Supporting Evidence

  • Hypermethylation of RASSF1A was found in 94% of tumor samples.
  • Serum methylation of RASSF1A was observed in 25% of patients.
  • Serum RASSF1A methylation was significantly associated with age ≥12 months at diagnosis.
  • Patients with serum-methylated RASSF1A had significantly worse overall survival.
  • The 5-year survival was over 90% in patients without serum methylation.
  • RASSF1A methylation in serum had a hazard ratio of 9.2 compared to unmethylated patients.
  • Multivariate analysis showed a hazard ratio of 2.4 for serum RASSF1A methylation.

Takeaway

This study looked at a gene called RASSF1A in the blood of kids with a type of cancer called neuroblastoma to see if it could help predict how well they would do.

Methodology

The study analyzed the methylation status of the RASSF1A gene in matched tumor and serum DNA samples from neuroblastoma patients.

Potential Biases

The study may have biases related to retrospective data collection and the small number of patients in certain subgroups.

Limitations

The study's findings need to be confirmed in larger studies due to the small sample size and potential biases in retrospective data collection.

Participant Demographics

Of the 68 patients, 39.7% were male and 60.3% were female, with 61.8% younger than 12 months at diagnosis.

Statistical Information

P-Value

P<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI, 2.8–30.1

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6604887

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication