Assessing Knowledge Translation in Research Organizations
Author Information
Author(s): Gholami Jaleh, Majdzadeh Reza, Nedjat Saharnaz, Nedjat Sima, Maleki Katayoun, Ashoorkhani Mahnaz, Yazdizadeh Bahareh
Primary Institution: Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Hypothesis
How should we assess knowledge translation in research organizations?
Conclusion
The self-assessment tool identifies gaps in knowledge translation capacity and infrastructure within research organizations.
Supporting Evidence
- The tool consists of 50 statements across four domains.
- Mean scores in the domains ranged from 1.89 to 2.92 out of 5.
- The study highlighted the need for financial support and better infrastructure for knowledge translation.
Takeaway
This study created a tool to help research organizations see how well they share knowledge and what they can improve.
Methodology
The tool was used in group discussions among members of research councils and researchers from 20 TUMS-affiliated centers.
Limitations
The tool's reliability varied across different domains, particularly in promoting the use of evidence.
Participant Demographics
Participants included researchers and representatives from 20 research centers affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website