Fundamental flaws of hormesis for public health decisions
2005
Concerns About Hormesis in Public Health
publication
Author Information
Author(s): Thayer Kristina A., Melnick Ronald, Huff James, Burns Kathy, Davis Devra
Primary Institution: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Hypothesis
Should hormesis be considered in public health policy?
Conclusion
The authors argue that allowing higher exposures to toxic substances based on alleged hormetic benefits could be harmful to public health.
Supporting Evidence
- Changing health policies to allow higher exposures based on untested benefits could harm vulnerable populations.
- Health-protective assumptions should not be dismissed without scientific evidence.
- Some toxic substances can cause harmful effects even at low doses.
Takeaway
The study says that just because a little bit of something might seem good, it doesn't mean we should allow more of it, especially if it's toxic.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website