Patients' perception and actual practice of informed consent, privacy and confidentiality in general medical outpatient departments of two tertiary care hospitals of Lahore
2008

Patients' Views on Informed Consent and Privacy in Lahore Hospitals

Sample size: 186 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Humayun Ayesha, Fatima Noor, Naqqash Shahid, Hussain Salwa, Rasheed Almas, Imtiaz Huma, Imam Sardar Zakariya

Primary Institution: Department of Community Health Sciences, FMH College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan

Hypothesis

How well do doctors in Lahore adhere to informed consent, privacy, and confidentiality during outpatient consultations?

Conclusion

Doctors in Lahore inadequately observe medical ethics, highlighting the need for formal training and patient awareness.

Supporting Evidence

  • Informed consent was obtained from only 9.7% of patients in the public hospital.
  • Patients in the private hospital reported better adherence to privacy and confidentiality.
  • There was a significant difference in the practice of informed consent between public and private hospitals.

Takeaway

Doctors in Lahore often don't ask patients for permission before treatment, and many patients don't know their rights.

Methodology

A cross-sectional study observing doctor-patient interactions in outpatient departments of one public and one private hospital.

Potential Biases

Doctors were unaware of which patient interactions were being graded, but patient perceptions may not align with actual practices.

Limitations

The study may not represent all hospitals in Lahore and relies on patient perceptions which can be subjective.

Participant Demographics

{"total_patients":186,"gender_distribution":{"female":138,"male":48},"age_mean":{"public_hospital":34.9,"private_hospital":37.6}}

Statistical Information

P-Value

< 0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication