Determining the Effect of Varied Proportions of Cohort Administered Tulathromycin at Arrival on Nasopharyngeal Microbiota and Performance Characteristics in Yearling Steers in the First 56 Days on Feed
2024

Effect of Tulathromycin on Cattle Microbiota and Performance

Sample size: 160 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Johnson Blaine T., White Brad J., Amachawadi Raghavendra G., Kleinhenz Michael D., Farney Jaymelynn K., Shippy Teresa D., Larson Robert L.

Primary Institution: Kansas State University

Hypothesis

What are the effects of varying proportions of tulathromycin treatment on the nasopharyngeal microbiota and performance characteristics in yearling steers?

Conclusion

The study found no significant differences in performance metrics or the nasal microbiome between treatment groups, but noted significant temporal changes in bacterial populations over time.

Supporting Evidence

  • Sampling day significantly affected the diversity of the microbiome.
  • No significant differences in performance metrics were observed between treatment groups.
  • Resistance patterns of bacteria varied over time but were not significantly different between treatment groups.

Takeaway

This study looked at how giving different amounts of a medicine called tulathromycin to cattle affects their health and the germs in their noses. It found that the amount of medicine didn't change their health or nose germs much, but the germs did change over time.

Methodology

Yearling steers were randomly allocated to pens and treated with either all or half receiving tulathromycin, with nasal swabs collected at multiple time points for analysis.

Potential Biases

The small pen dynamics may differ from larger pens, potentially affecting the results.

Limitations

The study had a small number of cattle per pen and some pens were removed from analysis due to heat stress deaths.

Participant Demographics

Yearling steers of angus-based genetics.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/microorganisms12122512

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication