Effect of Delaying 5-ALA Administration on Bladder Cancer Diagnosis
Author Information
Author(s): Taoka Rikiya, Fukuhara Hideo, Miyake Makito, Kobayashi Keita, Ikeda Atsushi, Kanao Kent, Komai Yoshinobu, Fujiwara Ryo, Sato Yusuke, Sugimoto Mikio, Tsuzuki Toyonori, Fujimoto Kiyohide, Inoue Keiji, Oya Mototsugu
Primary Institution: Kagawa University Hospital
Hypothesis
Does extending the period from oral administration of 5-ALA to photodynamic diagnosis improve diagnostic accuracy and safety for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer?
Conclusion
Extending the administration period of 5-ALA to 4–8 hours before diagnosis maintains high sensitivity and acceptable safety for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Supporting Evidence
- BL-sensitivity was 95.3%, exceeding the non-inferiority threshold of 70%.
- Sensitivity and specificity were significantly higher and lower for BL than WL, respectively.
- 93.8% of patients experienced adverse events, mostly grade 1 or 2.
- The study included 161 patients from eight hospitals.
- BL-sensitivity for flat NMIBC was significantly higher than WL-sensitivity.
Takeaway
This study shows that waiting longer after taking a medicine called 5-ALA before checking for bladder cancer can still work well and is safe.
Methodology
This was a single-arm, phase III, multicenter trial evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and safety of photodynamic diagnosis at an extended administration period of 4–8 hours after 5-ALA administration.
Potential Biases
Potential variability in PDD-positivity criteria among different surgeons.
Limitations
The study was a single-arm trial, limiting direct comparison with the authorized administration period.
Participant Demographics
{"total":145,"male":118,"female":27,"age_mean":69.4,"age_range":"20-85"}
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Confidence Interval
95% CI: 92.4–97.3%
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website