Evaluating Benefits of Early-Phase Interventions for Dyads
Author Information
Author(s): Karen Lyons, Luke Russell, Kalisha Bonds Johnson, Glenna Brewster, Lyndsey Miller
Primary Institution: Boston College
Hypothesis
How do pre-test risk and relational impact affect the benefits of early-phase interventions for dyads?
Conclusion
The study found that while some dyads experienced positive outcomes from the intervention, those with the highest pre-test risk did not see expected benefits.
Supporting Evidence
- 37-68% of older adults with chronic illness were at-risk at baseline.
- 40-79% of care partners were at-risk at baseline.
- 40% of dyads who received the intervention had expected positive outcomes for depressive symptoms and self-efficacy.
- 20% had expected positive scores for depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, and aerobic exercise.
- 13% had expected positive scores for all five target outcomes.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well interventions help both members of a caregiving pair, finding that some pairs did better than others, especially if they were at high risk before starting.
Methodology
The study examined pre-test risk status and dyadic benefits of a health behavior intervention using pattern analysis.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the small sample size and the nature of quasi-experimental designs.
Limitations
The study primarily focused on small sample sizes and may not generalize to larger populations.
Participant Demographics
Participants included older adults with chronic illness and their care partners.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website