A promising method for identifying cross-cultural differences in patient perspective: the use of Internet-based focus groups for content validation of new Patient Reported Outcome assessments
2006

Using Internet Focus Groups to Understand Patient Perspectives

Sample size: 54 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Mark J Atkinson, Jan Lohs, Ilka Kuhagen, Julie Kaufman, Shamsu Bhaidani

Primary Institution: Worldwide Health Outcomes Research, La Jolla Laboratories, Pfizer Inc.

Hypothesis

Can Internet-based focus groups effectively identify cross-cultural differences in patient-reported outcomes?

Conclusion

Internet focus groups were found to be effective and efficient for developing culturally sensitive patient-reported outcome measures.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study highlighted significant differences in how participants from the US and Germany discussed their oily skin issues.
  • Moderators played a crucial role in coding and analyzing the thematic content of the discussions.
  • Participants reported feeling more comfortable discussing sensitive issues in an online setting compared to face-to-face.

Takeaway

This study used online discussions to learn how people from different countries feel about oily skin, helping to create better questions for future surveys.

Methodology

The study used Internet focus groups to gather qualitative data from participants in Germany and the US about their experiences with oily skin.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the moderators' probing techniques and the coding of responses.

Limitations

The study may have sampling biases due to differences in recruitment methods and participant demographics between countries.

Participant Demographics

Participants included individuals aged 18-65 experiencing oily skin, with a mix of ethnic backgrounds and varying medical histories.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.02

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1477-7525-4-64

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication