Reliability and relative validity of a child nutrition questionnaire to simultaneously assess dietary patterns associated with positive energy balance and food behaviours, attitudes, knowledge and environments associated with healthy eating
2008

Child Nutrition Questionnaire Validity and Reliability

Sample size: 141 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Annabelle M Wilson, Anthea M Magarey, Nadia Mastersson

Primary Institution: Flinders University of South Australia

Hypothesis

The study aims to determine the reliability and relative validity of a child nutrition questionnaire assessing dietary patterns and food behaviours in children.

Conclusion

The child nutrition questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessing dietary patterns and food behaviours in Australian school children aged 10–12 years.

Supporting Evidence

  • The questionnaire was developed to measure dietary patterns and food behaviours relevant to childhood obesity prevention.
  • Test-retest reliability showed ICCs ranging from 0.47 to 0.66 for most scores.
  • Spearman correlations for validity ranged from 0.34 to 0.48.

Takeaway

Researchers created a questionnaire to help understand what kids eat and how they feel about food, and found it works well.

Methodology

A 14-item questionnaire was administered to children aged 10-12 years, with test-retest reliability assessed using ICC and validity assessed with Spearman correlations.

Potential Biases

Potential overestimation of fruit and vegetable intake due to children's difficulty in estimating portion sizes.

Limitations

The questionnaire's complexity may have affected the accuracy of responses, and the food diary used for validation was not a validated tool itself.

Participant Demographics

62% female, approximately one-third from each grade (36% grade five, 33% grade six, 31% grade seven), 66% from metropolitan schools, 61% from public schools.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% confidence intervals for ICCs ranged from 0.31–0.75.

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1479-5868-5-5

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication