Leisure Activities, Social Capital, and IQ in Rural and Urban Areas
Author Information
Author(s): Reynolds Chandra, Trubenstein Paige, Pahlen Shandell, Corley Robin, Rey Sergio, Wadsworth Sally
Primary Institution: University of Colorado Boulder
Hypothesis
How do behavioral engagement and geospatial features influence cognitive functioning in individuals approaching midlife?
Conclusion
Cognitive engagement positively affects IQ, but rural individuals show less sensitivity to social capital compared to urban residents.
Supporting Evidence
- Cognitive engagement was found to have a main effect on IQ.
- Rural individuals' IQ performance was less sensitive to fluctuations in social capital.
- Higher IQ scores among urban residents were only observed when social capital was high.
Takeaway
Doing brainy activities helps you think better, but people in the countryside might not get as much help from their community as those in the city.
Methodology
The study used data from the Colorado Adoption/Twin Study of Lifespan behavioral development and cognitive aging to evaluate the relationship between cognitive performance, activity engagement, and social capital.
Limitations
The study may not account for all variables influencing cognitive performance across different locales.
Participant Demographics
Participants had a mean age of 33.17 years, with a range from 28.05 to 49.33 years.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website