Factors Influencing Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials
Author Information
Author(s): Alison M McDonald, Rosemary C Knight, Marion K Campbell, Vikki A Entwistle, Adrian M Grant, Jonathan A Cook, Diana R Elbourne, David Francis, Jo Garcia, Ian Roberts, Claire Snowdon
Primary Institution: Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen
Hypothesis
What factors are associated with good and poor recruitment in multicentre trials funded by UK public bodies?
Conclusion
Many trials experienced recruitment difficulties, and addressing the trial question may be more important than recruitment alone.
Supporting Evidence
- Only 31% of trials achieved their original recruitment target.
- 41% of trials experienced delays in starting recruitment.
- 63% of trials reported early recruitment problems.
- Half of the trials required an extension to their recruitment period.
Takeaway
This study looked at why some medical trials have a hard time getting enough people to join. It found that many trials struggle to meet their goals for how many participants they need.
Methodology
The study reviewed 114 trials funded by the MRC and HTA, analyzing trial characteristics and recruitment success using Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests.
Potential Biases
Potential biases include reliance on self-reported data from trialists and the exclusion of cluster trials.
Limitations
The study could not assess the causal link between recruitment strategies and success due to the observational nature of the data.
Participant Demographics
The trials included a variety of clinical areas and settings, but specific demographic details of participants were not provided.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.017
Confidence Interval
0.14, 0.84
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website