Social inequalities and correlates of psychotropic drug use among young adults: a population-based questionnaire study
2008

Social Inequalities and Psychotropic Drug Use in Young Adults

Sample size: 1257 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Chau Nearkasen, Baumann Michèle, Falissard Bruno, Choquet Marie

Primary Institution: Inserm, U669, Paris, France

Hypothesis

Are there disparities in psychotropic drug use among young adults from different socio-occupational groups, and are these disparities mediated by various factors?

Conclusion

There are marked disparities in psychotropic drug use among young adults from different socio-occupational groups, influenced by factors such as health status and family support.

Supporting Evidence

  • Frequent use of psychotropic drugs was common, with 33.2% of young adults reporting use.
  • Women were found to use psychotropic drugs at twice the rate of men.
  • Manual workers had significantly higher odds of psychotropic drug use compared to upper/intermediate professionals.
  • Health status, musculoskeletal disorders, and lack of family support were significant factors related to drug use.

Takeaway

This study found that young adults from different jobs use psychotropic drugs at different rates, and things like health and family support can affect this.

Methodology

A population-based questionnaire study with 1,257 young adults aged 18-29 in north-eastern France, analyzing various socio-demographic and health-related factors.

Potential Biases

Potential selection bias due to the self-administered questionnaire and modest participation rate.

Limitations

The study had a modest participation rate and relied on self-reported data, which may introduce bias.

Participant Demographics

Young adults aged 18-29, with a sample reflecting the general population of Lorraine in terms of age and sex distribution.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 1.02–6.44

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1475-9276-7-3

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication