How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?
2006

Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Patients with Spontaneous Breathing

Sample size: 21 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Heenen Sarah, De Backer Daniel, Vincent Jean-Louis

Primary Institution: Erasme University Hospital, Free University of Brussels

Hypothesis

Can different static and dynamic measurements of preload predict fluid responsiveness in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements?

Conclusion

Static indices are better predictors of fluid responsiveness than dynamic indices in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements.

Supporting Evidence

  • Cardiac index increased from 3.0 to 3.5 l minute-1 m-2 after fluid challenge.
  • Static indices had a ROC curve area of 0.73 for PAOP, indicating better predictive value than dynamic indices.
  • Fluid responsiveness was defined as a 15% increase in cardiac output after fluid challenge.

Takeaway

Doctors wanted to see if certain measurements could help them know if patients would respond well to fluid treatment. They found that some measurements worked better than others.

Methodology

The study involved 21 critically ill patients who received fluid challenges while their hemodynamic measurements were taken before and after the challenge.

Limitations

The study did not evaluate volumetric indices of preload, which may perform better than pressure measurements.

Participant Demographics

Patients included were critically ill, aged 18 and older, with spontaneous breathing movements.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/cc4970

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication