Relationship between insertion/deletion (indel) frequency of proteins and essentiality
2007

Indel Frequency in Essential Proteins

Sample size: 14214 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Chan Simon K, Hsing Michael, Hormozdiari Fereydoun, Cherkasov Artem

Primary Institution: Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre

Hypothesis

Essential proteins will likely contain more indels due to stronger selective pressure and the need for new interaction sites.

Conclusion

Indels are more frequent in essential proteins than in non-essential proteins, suggesting a role in protein interactions.

Supporting Evidence

  • Essential proteins had significantly greater indel frequencies than non-essential proteins.
  • The Weibull distribution accurately modeled indel abundances in both essential and non-essential proteins.
  • ROC curves indicated that indel frequencies alone could not reliably predict protein essentiality.

Takeaway

Essential proteins have more changes in their sequences than non-essential ones, which helps them interact better with other proteins.

Methodology

The study analyzed protein sequences from three species and compared indel frequencies using t-tests and ROC curves.

Limitations

The study did not consider the location of indels in protein structures, which is important for drug design.

Participant Demographics

Proteins from Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were analyzed.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2105-8-227

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication