Cost-Effectiveness of Occupational Health Intervention for High-Risk Workers
Author Information
Author(s): Taimela S, Justén S, Aronen P, Sintonen H, Läärä E, Malmivaara A, Tiekso J, Aro T
Primary Institution: Evalua International, Vantaa, Finland
Hypothesis
Is a specific occupational health intervention cost effective in reducing sickness absence compared to usual care for workers at high risk of sickness absence?
Conclusion
The occupational health intervention is a cost-effective use of healthcare resources, reducing sickness absence significantly compared to usual care.
Supporting Evidence
- The intervention group had 11 fewer sickness absence days on average compared to the usual care group.
- The intervention was both cost-saving and more effective than usual occupational health care.
- Cost savings were €43 per sickness absence day avoided with available direct cost data.
Takeaway
This study shows that helping workers who often miss work due to health issues can save money and help them stay healthier.
Methodology
Randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation comparing an occupational health intervention to usual care.
Potential Biases
Non-respondents in the control group had significantly more sickness absence than respondents, which may affect the cost-effectiveness results.
Limitations
The study's health outcomes were based on available data, which may not be completely random, potentially biasing results.
Participant Demographics
418 workers, 88% male, 62% blue-collar, from one corporation in Finland.
Statistical Information
Confidence Interval
95% CI 1 to 20 days
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website