Understanding Stakeholder Perspectives on Generative AI in Aging Research
Author Information
Author(s): Cudjoe Thomas, Schoenborn Nancy, Ashida Sato
Primary Institution: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Hypothesis
What are the perspectives of diverse stakeholders on research priorities and decision-making regarding generative AI in aging?
Conclusion
Stakeholders have shared and distinct priorities for the use of generative AI in health services, emphasizing both benefits and concerns.
Supporting Evidence
- Stakeholders identified priority areas for AI, such as social engagement and care coordination.
- Participants saw AI taking over burdensome tasks and improving efficiency.
- Concerns about AI included unintended consequences and the need for guardrails.
- Decisions on AI adoption were influenced by ease of use, implementation, and cost.
Takeaway
We talked to different people about how AI can help older adults and found out what they think is important and what worries them.
Methodology
In-depth interviews with 49 stakeholders including older adults, caregivers, clinicians, entrepreneurs, investors, and payers.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in stakeholder selection and responses.
Limitations
The study may not capture all perspectives as it is based on a specific sample of stakeholders.
Participant Demographics
Participants included older adults, caregivers, clinicians, entrepreneurs, investors, and payers from urban and rural areas.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website