Identifying Best Practices for WISEWOMAN Programs
Author Information
Author(s): Besculides Melanie, Zaveri Heather, Farris Rosanne, Will Julie
Primary Institution: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Hypothesis
What are the most effective practices used in selected state or tribal WISEWOMAN projects and local sites to design and deliver lifestyle interventions?
Conclusion
Using a mixed-methods evaluation minimized the weaknesses inherent in each method and improved the completeness and quality of data collected.
Supporting Evidence
- Pilot testing data collection methods allowed for critical revisions.
- Conducting preliminary interviews allowed for more in-depth interviews while on site.
- Observing the lifestyle intervention being administered was key to understanding the program.
- Conducting focus groups with participants helped to validate information from other sources.
Takeaway
This study looked at how to find the best ways to help women stay healthy by using different methods to gather information from programs that help them.
Methodology
A mixed-methods evaluation that integrated quantitative and qualitative inquiry, including interviews, observation, and focus groups.
Potential Biases
Qualitative data may lack generalizability due to focus group participant selection.
Limitations
The study faced challenges in recruiting participants for focus groups and ensuring confidentiality during observations.
Participant Demographics
Women aged 40 to 64 years who are uninsured and ineligible for Medicaid.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website