Quality and Relevance of Canadian Clinical Guidelines for Patients with Comorbidity
Author Information
Author(s): Martin Fortin, Eric Contant, Catherine Savard, Catherine Hudon, Marie-Eve Poitras, José Almirall
Primary Institution: Université de Sherbrooke
Hypothesis
How relevant and high-quality are Canadian clinical guidelines for adults with multiple chronic conditions?
Conclusion
The quality of Canadian guidelines is generally good, but their relevance for patients with two or more chronic conditions is very limited.
Supporting Evidence
- 56.2% of guidelines addressed treatment for patients with multiple chronic conditions.
- 93.8% of guidelines included specific recommendations for patients with one comorbid condition.
- Only 18.8% of guidelines addressed specific recommendations for patients with two comorbid conditions.
Takeaway
This study looked at Canadian health guidelines to see if they help people with multiple health problems. They found that while the guidelines are mostly good, they don't do a great job for people with more than two health issues.
Methodology
A descriptive study based on a literature review and critical appraisal of clinical guidelines.
Potential Biases
Reviewer's background knowledge may influence ratings.
Limitations
Results cannot be generalized to other Canadian guidelines not included in this study; the evaluation tool used is relatively new.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website