Health Consultation: Residential Mercury Spills from Gas Regulators in Illinois
2006

Residential Mercury Spills from Gas Regulators

Sample size: 171 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Daniel Hryhorczuk, Victoria Persky, Julie Piorkowski, Jennifer Davis, C. Michael Moomey, Anne Krantz, Ken D. Runkle, Tiffanie Saxer, Thomas Baughman, Ken McCann

Primary Institution: Great Lakes Center for Children’s Environmental Health, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County

Hypothesis

What are the risks of residential mercury contamination after the removal of gas regulators?

Conclusion

The study found that the risk of residential mercury contamination after gas regulator removal ranged from 0.9 to 4.3 per 1,000 homes, with a significantly higher risk of 16.7% for one contractor.

Supporting Evidence

  • 1,363 homes were found to have residential mercury contamination after inspections.
  • Six out of 171 homes had residents with urine mercury levels ≥ 10 μg/L.
  • The highest urine mercury concentration observed was 26 μg/L.
  • Positive bioassays were most strongly associated with mercury air concentrations > 10 μg/m3.
  • The risk of contamination was significantly higher for one contractor at 16.7%.

Takeaway

When gas regulators that contain mercury are removed from homes, they can spill mercury, which is dangerous. This study found that some homes had high levels of mercury after such removals.

Methodology

The study involved urine mercury screening and environmental air measurements in homes where gas regulators were removed.

Potential Biases

There may be bias in reporting and identifying homes with mercury contamination due to lack of records.

Limitations

The study did not evaluate potential subtle effects of mercury exposure in individuals.

Participant Demographics

The study included residents from homes in northern Illinois, with a focus on families affected by mercury spills.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI, 3.6–125.9

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1289/ehp.8401

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication