Modified FOLFOX-6 chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: Results of phase II study and comprehensive analysis of polymorphisms as a predictive and prognostic marker
2008

Modified FOLFOX-6 chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

Sample size: 73 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Keam Bhumsuk, Im Seock-Ah, Han Sae-Won, Ham Hye Seon, Kim Min A, Oh Do-Youn, Lee Se-Hoon, Kim Jee Hyun, Kim Dong-Wan, Kim Tae-You, Heo Dae Seog, Kim Woo Ho, Bang Yung-Jue

Primary Institution: Seoul National University Hospital

Hypothesis

The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of modified FOLFOX-6 chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer and analyze the predictive value of genetic polymorphisms.

Conclusion

Modified FOLFOX-6 chemotherapy appears to be active and well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients.

Supporting Evidence

  • The overall response rate was 43.8%.
  • Median time to progression was 6.0 months.
  • Median overall survival was 12.6 months.
  • Toxicities were generally tolerable and manageable.
  • The 6-bp deletion in TS-3'UTR was significantly associated with prolonged TTP and OS.
  • Performance status was a statistically significant prognostic factor for TTP.

Takeaway

This study tested a new chemotherapy for stomach cancer and found it works well and is safe for patients.

Methodology

Seventy-three patients received modified FOLFOX-6 chemotherapy, and genetic polymorphisms were analyzed for their predictive value.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and was conducted at a single institution.

Participant Demographics

{"gender":{"male":48,"female":25},"age":{"median":59,"range":"24-77"},"performance_status":{"ECOG 0-1":60,"ECOG 2":13},"histopathologic_type":{"intestinal":47,"diffuse":23,"unknown":3}}

Statistical Information

P-Value

p = 0.034

Confidence Interval

{"overall_survival":"95% CI, 8.7–16.5 months","time_to_progression":"95% CI, 4.8–7.2 months"}

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2407-8-148

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication