Cost-effective design of economic instruments in nutrition policy
2007

Using Economic Instruments to Improve Nutrition Policy

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jensen Jørgen D, Smed Sinne

Primary Institution: Institute of Food and Resource Economics, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen

Hypothesis

Can targeted taxes and subsidies effectively improve dietary habits and reduce health risks associated with poor nutrition?

Conclusion

Targeted economic instruments like taxes and subsidies can significantly improve dietary intake and reduce health risks.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study found that targeted taxes and subsidies could improve dietary intake by 10-30%.
  • Different demographic groups respond variably to economic incentives.
  • Empirical evidence on the effects of food taxation is limited but suggests potential benefits.

Takeaway

This study looks at how changing food prices through taxes and subsidies can help people eat healthier and avoid getting sick.

Methodology

The study used an economic model to analyze the effects of various food taxes and subsidies on dietary habits in Denmark.

Potential Biases

There may be biases in how different demographic groups respond to economic incentives.

Limitations

The study does not account for all potential consumer responses to price changes and may overestimate the effects of taxes.

Participant Demographics

The study focuses on dietary behaviors in Denmark, with variations noted by age, education level, and region.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1479-5868-4-10

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication