Public Engagement in Health Financing Decisions
Author Information
Author(s): Matthew S McCoy, Johan L Dellgren, Ezekiel J Emanuel
Primary Institution: Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Hypothesis
Does public engagement in health financing decisions lead to more equitable outcomes?
Conclusion
Public engagement does not necessarily prioritize equity over other values in health financing decisions.
Supporting Evidence
- Public engagement does not guarantee that equity will be prioritized over other values.
- Examples from Israel and Chile show that public preferences may favor health maximization over equity.
- The World Bank's report assumes public engagement will lead to equitable outcomes, which is not necessarily true.
Takeaway
This study says that just because people are involved in health decisions doesn't mean they'll choose fairness; they might care more about other things, like getting better health overall.
Methodology
The study analyzes evidence from national-level public engagement initiatives and critiques the assumptions made in the World Bank's report on health financing.
Potential Biases
The assumption that public engagement will lead to equitable outcomes may overlook the diverse values held by the public.
Limitations
The study does not provide empirical data to support its claims about public engagement outcomes.
Participant Demographics
The study references public engagement initiatives that included diverse populations, such as minorities and new immigrants.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website