General Practitioners' Views on Reattribution for Medically Unexplained Symptoms
Author Information
Author(s): Dowrick Christopher, Gask Linda, Hughes John G, Charles-Jones Huw, Hogg Judith A, Peters Sarah, Salmon Peter, Rogers Anne R, Morriss Richard K
Primary Institution: University of Liverpool
Hypothesis
What do general practitioners think about reattribution training for patients with medically unexplained symptoms?
Conclusion
Reattribution training increases practitioners' confidence in managing patients with medically unexplained symptoms, but significant barriers to its implementation remain.
Supporting Evidence
- 95% of study participants responded to the survey.
- Practitioners trained in reattribution reported increased confidence in managing patients.
- Barriers to implementation were identified at multiple levels including patient beliefs and healthcare context.
- Many GPs expressed that patients with medically unexplained symptoms often cause considerable stress.
Takeaway
Doctors who learned about reattribution feel better at helping patients with unexplained symptoms, but there are still many challenges in using this approach in real life.
Methodology
A nested attitudinal survey and qualitative study involving structured surveys and semi-structured interviews with general practitioners.
Potential Biases
The sample may be biased towards practitioners who are more sympathetic to patients with medically unexplained symptoms.
Limitations
The views expressed may not represent all general practitioners, and the study's context may not be generalizable to other healthcare settings.
Participant Demographics
Participants included 73 general practitioners and one nurse prescriber, mostly aged 35 to 50, with a mix of genders and practice settings.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.048 and 0.003
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website