Utility of Recent Studies to Assess the National Research Council 2001 Estimates of Cancer Risk from Ingested Arsenic
2011

Review of Cancer Risk from Arsenic in Drinking Water

Sample size: 195 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Gibb Herman, Haver Cary, Gaylor David, Ramasamy Santhini, Lee Janice S., Lobdell Danelle, Wade Timothy, Chen Chao, White Paul, Sams Reeder

Primary Institution: Tetra Tech Sciences

Hypothesis

Are recent studies consistent with the NRC's assessment of cancer risk from low concentrations of arsenic in drinking water?

Conclusion

Recent studies suggest that lung and bladder cancer risks may increase at arsenic concentrations below 100 μg/L, but many studies lack the statistical power to confirm this.

Supporting Evidence

  • Fourteen epidemiologic studies were identified as potentially useful for the analysis.
  • Recent studies indicate increased cancer risks at arsenic concentrations < 100 μg/L.
  • Sample sizes needed to detect cancer risks are large, making it difficult to validate NRC estimates.
  • Synergistic effects of arsenic and smoking were noted in several studies.
  • Data from Taiwan provide the best basis for quantitative risk assessment of arsenic-related cancers.

Takeaway

This study looks at how drinking water with arsenic might cause cancer, especially in the lungs and bladder, and finds that more research is needed to understand the risks.

Methodology

The authors reviewed epidemiologic studies published from 2001 to September 2010 that assessed lung and bladder cancer risks from low arsenic exposure in drinking water.

Potential Biases

Exposure misclassification may have reduced the ability to detect true associations between arsenic exposure and cancer risk.

Limitations

Many studies had small sample sizes and were unable to detect the NRC-estimated cancer risks due to short exposure durations and potential exposure misclassification.

Participant Demographics

The studies included diverse populations from various regions, including Taiwan, Denmark, Argentina, and the USA.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1289/ehp.1002427

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication