Why did soft drink consumption decrease but screen time not? Mediating mechanisms in a school-based obesity prevention program
2008

School-based obesity prevention program reduces soft drink consumption

Sample size: 854 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Chin A Paw Marijke JM, Singh Amika S, Brug Johannes, van Mechelen Willem

Primary Institution: VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Hypothesis

Can a school-based obesity prevention program effectively reduce sugar-containing beverage consumption among adolescents?

Conclusion

The DOiT program successfully reduced sugar-containing beverage consumption among boys but not girls, indicating the need for gender-specific interventions.

Supporting Evidence

  • The intervention reduced sugar-containing beverage consumption by 303.5 ml/day in boys and 222.3 ml/day in girls.
  • Boys showed improved attitudes towards reducing sugar-containing beverage consumption.
  • Changes in attitude and habit strength were significant mediators for boys.
  • The program did not significantly affect other energy balance-related behaviors.
  • Girls did not show significant changes in mediators or consumption behaviors.

Takeaway

This study shows that a program in schools can help boys drink less soda, but it didn't work for girls, so we need to find better ways to help them.

Methodology

The study used a controlled, cluster-randomised trial design in Dutch prevocational secondary schools to evaluate the DOiT program.

Potential Biases

Social desirability bias and potential over- or underreporting of behaviors may have influenced the results.

Limitations

The study relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to bias, and the mediators and outcomes were measured simultaneously, complicating causal interpretations.

Participant Demographics

Participants were adolescents aged 12-13 years from lower educational levels, with a mix of boys and girls.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.01

Confidence Interval

95% CI: -502.4;-104.5 for boys, 95% CI: -371.3;-73.2 for girls

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1479-5868-5-41

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication