Comparing Two Treatments for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Author Information
Author(s): Souglakos J, Androulakis N, Syrigos K, Polyzos A, Ziras N, Athanasiadis A, Kakolyris S, Tsousis S, Kouroussis Ch, Vamvakas L, Kalykaki A, Samonis G, Mavroudis D, Georgoulias V
Primary Institution: University General Hospital of Heraklion
Hypothesis
To compare the efficacy and toxicity of FOLFOXIRI vs FOLFIRI as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Conclusion
The study found no significant survival advantage of FOLFOXIRI over FOLFIRI, despite FOLFOXIRI showing a longer median overall survival.
Supporting Evidence
- Patients treated with FOLFOXIRI had a higher incidence of alopecia, diarrhoea, and neurosensory toxicity.
- The median overall survival was 19.5 months for FOLFIRI and 21.5 months for FOLFOXIRI.
- 85% of patients had disease progression and 62% had died by the end of the study.
Takeaway
Doctors wanted to see if a new combination of drugs worked better than an older one for treating cancer, but they found out that both worked about the same.
Methodology
A multicentre randomised phase III trial comparing FOLFOXIRI and FOLFIRI in 283 chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Limitations
The study did not demonstrate a significant difference in overall survival between the two treatment regimens.
Participant Demographics
Patients were mostly older adults, with nearly half being 65 years or older.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.337
Confidence Interval
95% CI: 1.701–3.703
Statistical Significance
p=0.337
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website