Economics and Preventing Hospital-acquired Infection
2004

Economics of Preventing Hospital Infection

Sample size: 50000 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Nicholas Graves

Primary Institution: Queensland University of Technology

Hypothesis

How much should be invested for infection control, and what are the most appropriate infection-control programs?

Conclusion

Investing in infection control can lead to significant cost savings by reducing hospital-acquired infections.

Supporting Evidence

  • Approximately 1 in 10 hospitalized patients will acquire an infection after admission.
  • The annual economic burden of hospital-acquired infections is estimated at $6.7 billion in the US.
  • Effective infection-control strategies can release health sector resources for alternative uses.

Takeaway

Preventing infections in hospitals saves money because it means patients spend less time in the hospital and more patients can be treated.

Methodology

The study uses hypothetical data to analyze costs and benefits of infection control strategies.

Limitations

The analysis primarily focuses on costs and savings to the hospital, potentially overlooking broader social benefits.

Participant Demographics

Patients undergoing hip replacement in hospitals.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3201/eid1004.020754

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication