Factors affecting the concordance between orthologous gene trees and species tree in bacteria
2008

Orthologous Genes and Species History in Bacteria

Sample size: 370 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Castillo-Ramírez Santiago, González Víctor

Primary Institution: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Hypothesis

Do putative orthologous genes within bacteria reflect the history of the species?

Conclusion

Orthologous genes do not reflect the history of the species when taken as individual markers, but they do when taken as a whole.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study identified 370 orthologous genes from the bacterial order Rhizobiales.
  • Almost every orthologous gene had a distinct phylogeny.
  • The most common topology among the orthologous gene trees did not correspond with the best estimate of the species tree.
  • Stochastic error related to gene size affected the concordance between the species tree and the orthologous gene trees.

Takeaway

Scientists studied genes in bacteria to see if they tell the story of how species evolved. They found that while individual genes can be misleading, together they give a clearer picture.

Methodology

The study used a strict RBH approach to identify orthologous genes and applied filters to rule out false positives, followed by phylogenetic analysis.

Potential Biases

Functional bias in the selected orthologous genes may affect the results.

Limitations

The study may be limited by the potential for false positives in gene identification and the effects of incomplete lineage sorting.

Participant Demographics

The study focused on 25 Alphaproteobacteria, including 24 from the Rhizobiales order.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.00001

Statistical Significance

p<0.00001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2148-8-300

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication