A randomised trial of second-line hormone vs single agent chemotherapy in tamoxifen resistant advanced breast cancer
1992

Hormone Therapy vs Chemotherapy for Advanced Breast Cancer

Sample size: 60 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): A.R. Dixon, L. Jackson, S. Chan, J. Haybittle, R.W. Blamey

Primary Institution: City Hospital, Nottingham, UK

Hypothesis

Can second-line hormonal therapy provide similar benefits to chemotherapy in tamoxifen-resistant advanced breast cancer?

Conclusion

Second-line hormonal therapy with megesterol acetate can achieve similar disease control as mitozantrone chemotherapy in patients resistant to tamoxifen.

Supporting Evidence

  • One in three patients had substantial disease control for more than 6 months.
  • Seven patients (23%) showed objective response to mitozantrone compared to four (13%) receiving megesterol.
  • Toxicity was considerably higher in the mitozantrone group.

Takeaway

This study looked at two treatments for breast cancer that didn't respond to an earlier drug. One treatment was a hormone pill, and the other was a type of chemotherapy. Both worked similarly well.

Methodology

Sixty postmenopausal patients were randomized to receive either megesterol acetate or mitozantrone for four courses.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and was abandoned early due to lack of significant differences between treatments.

Participant Demographics

Sixty postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had relapsed within 6 months of tamoxifen treatment.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% confidence limits -0.095 to 0.325; 90% confidence limits -0.061 to 0.291

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication