Blood Biomarkers and Patient Outcomes After Mild TBI
Author Information
Author(s): Daniel P. Whitehouse, Lindsay Wilson, Endre Czeiter, Andras Buki, Kevin K.W. Wang, Nicole von Steinbüchel, Marina Zeldovich, Ewout Steyerberg, Andrew I.R. Maas, David K. Menon, Virginia F.J. Newcombe
Primary Institution: University of Cambridge
Hypothesis
Higher levels of day-of-injury biomarkers will be positively associated with worse patient-reported outcomes in both CT-negative and CT-positive mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients.
Conclusion
Higher concentrations of day-of-injury biomarkers are significantly associated with increased odds of functional impairment in both CT-positive and CT-negative mTBI patients.
Supporting Evidence
- Higher biomarker levels were associated with a GOSE score <8.
- CT-positive participants had higher odds of incomplete recovery.
- Inverse associations were observed between GFAP levels and mental health outcomes in CT-negative participants.
- Biomarker concentrations were significantly raised in participants with CT-positive mTBI.
- Participants with higher GFAP concentrations reported better HRQoL in CT-negative cases.
Takeaway
This study found that higher levels of certain blood markers after a mild brain injury can mean a worse recovery, but the relationship with mental health outcomes is more complicated.
Methodology
Participants with mild TBI were selected from the CENTER-TBI study, and multivariable binary logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between biomarker levels and 6-month outcomes.
Potential Biases
Potential selection bias due to the requirement of CT imaging for recruitment.
Limitations
The study may not fully account for CT-occult structural damage and the timing of biomarker sampling could affect results.
Participant Demographics
Median age 52 years, 66% male, 96% White, 77% with GCS 15.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Confidence Interval
95% CI 1.43–2.23 for S100B; 95% CI 1.11–1.36 for GFAP.
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website