Unveiling End-of-Life Disparities in Chronic Rheumatic Heart Disease: A 22-Year Analysis of the CDC-WONDER Database
2024

End-of-Life Disparities in Chronic Rheumatic Heart Disease

Sample size: 73673 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Muacevic Alexander, Adler John R, Khanal Anuva, Rao Nidhi Laxminarayan, Rajaravichandran Anubama, Pathil Alen Antony, Majumder Kaustav, Rodriguez Jairon

Hypothesis

This research examines mortality patterns and the place of death in individuals with chronic rheumatic heart disease in the United States, aiming to identify demographic predictors for home or hospice death.

Conclusion

The findings emphasize the importance of considering patients' preferences and ensuring equitable access to end-of-life care services, regardless of their demographic background.

Supporting Evidence

  • 73,673 deaths were analyzed from 1999 to 2020.
  • Age was found to be a significant predictor of place of death.
  • Individuals residing in the West were more likely to die at home or in hospice compared to other regions.
  • White individuals had a higher likelihood of dying at home or in hospice compared to other racial groups.

Takeaway

This study looked at where people with chronic rheumatic heart disease die and found that older people and certain racial groups are more likely to die at home or in hospice care.

Methodology

The study utilized data from the CDC-WONDER database, spanning 22 years, and analyzed it by age, gender, race, and region using the ARIMA model for statistical analysis.

Potential Biases

The study relies solely on data from CDC-WONDER, which may contain inaccuracies or inconsistencies in completion.

Limitations

The study does not account for socioeconomic factors such as income, education, or access to healthcare, which are significant contributors to disparities in end-of-life care.

Participant Demographics

The study included individuals aged 25 and older, with a focus on demographic factors such as age, gender, race, and census region.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% Confidence Interval

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.7759/cureus.75162

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication