Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers
2006
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers
Editorial
Author Information
Author(s): Philip E. Bourne, Alon Korngreen
Conclusion
The editorial provides guidelines for reviewers to improve the quality and efficiency of the peer review process.
Supporting Evidence
- The editorial is based on the authors' years of experience as reviewers.
- It emphasizes the importance of scientific novelty in papers.
- The article encourages reviewers to provide constructive feedback.
Takeaway
This article gives ten helpful tips for people who review scientific papers, like making sure you can finish on time and avoiding conflicts of interest.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website