Marginal Adaptation and Microleakeage of Directly and Indirectly Made Fiber Reinforced Composite Inlays
2011

Microleakage in Fiber Reinforced Composite Inlays

Sample size: 40 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ovul Kumbuloglu, Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay, Ahmet Saracoglu, Lippo VJ Lassila, Pekka K Vallittu

Primary Institution: Ege University, School of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Izmir, Turkey; University of Turku, Institute of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics and Turku Clinical Biomaterials Center, Turku, Finland

Hypothesis

There would be no difference in microleakage between tooth and inlays made by direct or indirect technique with and without FRC substructure.

Conclusion

The study suggests that using a fiber reinforced composite substructure in direct inlay fillings does not increase marginal leakage compared to indirect restorations.

Supporting Evidence

  • Microleakage in the occlusal area showed significant differences between groups.
  • FRC groups had lower microleakage than composite restorations.
  • Thickness of cement layer did not show significant difference between groups with indirect technique.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well different types of dental fillings keep out leaks. It found that using a special fiber in the filling doesn't make it leak more than other methods.

Methodology

Forty human premolars were restored using direct and indirect techniques with or without fiber reinforced composite, then tested for microleakage.

Participant Demographics

Forty human premolars free of visible caries.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.02

Statistical Significance

p=0.02

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.2174/1874210601105010033

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication