Do Teaching Hospitals Provide Better Patient Outcomes?
Author Information
Author(s): Jocalyn Clark, Peter Tugwell
Primary Institution: University of Ottawa
Hypothesis
Do academic teaching hospitals produce better or worse patient outcomes compared to non-academic health-care structures?
Conclusion
The systematic review found no evidence that teaching hospitals differ from nonacademic ones in terms of patient outcomes.
Supporting Evidence
- The systematic review included 132 studies.
- There were virtually no differences in mortality outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.
- Previous reviews have been unsystematic and lacked the quality of this study.
- The study adjusted for confounders such as case mix and severity.
- Most studies provided unadjusted data and defined a narrow set of outcomes.
Takeaway
This study looked at whether patients do better in teaching hospitals compared to regular hospitals, and it found that there is no difference.
Methodology
The authors conducted a systematic review of 132 studies evaluating patient outcomes in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals.
Potential Biases
Observational data may be prone to bias, and the majority of studies were conducted in the US, limiting generalizability.
Limitations
The studies included were mostly nonrandomized and focused on mortality rather than other patient-reported outcomes.
Participant Demographics
The studies included in the review were heterogeneous, with a significant number from the United States.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website