Role of communicating diagnostic uncertainty in the safety-netting process: insights from a vignette study
2024

Communicating Diagnostic Uncertainty in Safety-Netting

Sample size: 36 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Caitríona Cox, Thea Hatfield, Zoë Fritz

Primary Institution: The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Hypothesis

How and why do doctors communicate diagnostic uncertainty when safety-netting?

Conclusion

Doctors safety-netted variously, often without explicitly discussing diagnostic uncertainty, which may limit the effectiveness of safety-netting.

Supporting Evidence

  • Safety-netting was common but varied significantly among doctors.
  • Many doctors did not explicitly discuss diagnostic uncertainty when safety-netting.
  • Concerns about causing patient anxiety influenced how uncertainty was communicated.

Takeaway

Doctors sometimes tell patients to come back if they feel worse, but they don't always explain that their diagnosis might not be correct, which could lead to problems.

Methodology

Doctors were given clinical vignettes and interviewed about their safety-netting practices.

Potential Biases

Social desirability bias may have influenced participants' responses.

Limitations

The study used hypothetical vignettes, which may not reflect real-life consultations.

Participant Demographics

{"gender":{"female":18,"male":18},"ethnicity":{"white":19,"mixed":2,"asian":15,"black":0,"arab":0,"other":0},"grade":{"consultant":10,"registrar":10,"core trainee":9,"foundation doctor":7}}

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1136/bmjqs-2023-017037

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication