Severe maternal morbidity (near miss) as a sentinel event of maternal death. An attempt to use routine data for surveillance
2008

Severe Maternal Morbidity as a Warning Sign for Maternal Death

Sample size: 32679 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Maria H Sousa, Jose G Cecatti, Ellen E Hardy, Suzanne J Serruya

Primary Institution: University of Campinas (UNICAMP)

Hypothesis

Can routine data from the Brazilian Hospital Information System be used to identify severe maternal morbidity and its association with maternal death?

Conclusion

The study suggests that using routine data for monitoring severe maternal morbidity can help implement measures to prevent maternal deaths.

Supporting Evidence

  • The overall maternal near miss ratio was 44.3/1,000 live births.
  • 154 maternal deaths were identified among the records indicating near miss.
  • Common severe conditions included infection, preeclampsia, and hemorrhage.
  • Logistic regression identified significant interactions among various health conditions.

Takeaway

This study looked at hospital records to find out how many women had serious health problems during pregnancy and how many died, showing that we can use this information to help save lives.

Methodology

A descriptive population study using data from the Hospital Information System and Mortality Information System in Brazil, focusing on women aged 10-49 during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum.

Potential Biases

Potential underreporting of maternal deaths and reliance on hospital records that may not capture all cases.

Limitations

The study faced issues with incomplete data coverage and the use of live births instead of total deliveries for calculating maternal near miss ratios.

Participant Demographics

Women aged 10-49 years who were hospitalized during pregnancy, delivery, or postpartum in Brazilian capital cities.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.0001

Confidence Interval

[43.8–44.8]

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1742-4755-5-6

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication