Public Access to Genome-Wide Data: Five Views on Balancing Research with Privacy and Protection
2011

Risks of Identifying Individuals from Genome-Wide Association Studies

Sample size: 643 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Andrew D. Johnson, Richard O'Donnell

Primary Institution: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Hypothesis

What are the risks of misuse related to privacy and confidentiality in genome-wide association studies?

Conclusion

The study highlights significant risks of misuse of individual participant data in genome-wide association studies, particularly concerning privacy and confidentiality.

Supporting Evidence

  • Significant policy shifts have occurred due to privacy concerns raised by GWAS results.
  • Controlled access models have been implemented to reduce risks of data misuse.
  • 6.8% of studies may be at risk for misuse based on current guidelines.

Takeaway

This study looks at how sharing genetic data can sometimes accidentally reveal personal information about people, which can be a problem.

Methodology

A systematic survey of 643 GWAS articles published between November 2002 and July 1, 2010, assessing data availability and risks.

Potential Biases

Potential for misuse of individual participant data despite controlled access models.

Limitations

The study may overestimate the proportion of studies at risk since some classified as 'at potential risk' may have features that make misuse more difficult.

Participant Demographics

Studies included in the survey were published between 2002 and 2010, but specific demographics of participants were not detailed.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.006

Statistical Significance

p<0.006

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pgen.1002269

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication