Comparison of Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Means of Dissociating Adherent Monolayers of Mesenchymal Stem Cells
2009

Comparing Methods for Dissociating Stem Cells

Sample size: 3 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Heng Boon C, Cowan Catherine M, Basu Shubhayu

Primary Institution: Abbott Vascular

Hypothesis

Is enzyme-free dissociation as effective as trypsin for mesenchymal stem cells?

Conclusion

Dissociating mesenchymal stem cells with enzyme-free buffers results in significantly lower cell viability and reattachment compared to trypsin.

Supporting Evidence

  • Cell viability was significantly higher with trypsin compared to enzyme-free buffers.
  • The proportion of viable reattached cells was also significantly higher with trypsin.
  • Exposure to enzyme-free buffers did not significantly affect cell viability after dissociation.

Takeaway

This study found that using trypsin to separate stem cells is much better than using enzyme-free solutions, which can hurt the cells.

Methodology

The study compared cell viability and reattachment rates of mesenchymal stem cells dissociated with trypsin versus enzyme-free buffers using trypan blue exclusion and MTT assays.

Limitations

The study did not explore the underlying mechanisms for the differences in cell viability between the two dissociation methods.

Participant Demographics

Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p = 0.002

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1007/s12575-009-9001-4

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication