Non-response to a life course socioeconomic position indicator in surveillance: comparison of telephone and face-to-face modes
2008

Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Surveys on Parents' Education

Sample size: 5892 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Catherine R Chittleborough, Anne W Taylor, Fran E Baum, Janet E Hiller

Primary Institution: University of Adelaide

Hypothesis

Does the mode of survey (telephone vs. face-to-face) influence the recall of parents' highest level of education?

Conclusion

Face-to-face interviews yield higher response rates for questions about parents' education compared to telephone interviews.

Supporting Evidence

  • Face-to-face interviews had a significantly higher response rate for parents' education questions.
  • Missing data for parents' education was more common among socioeconomically disadvantaged respondents.
  • The study highlights the importance of survey mode in collecting retrospective data.

Takeaway

When asking people about their parents' education, talking to them in person gets more answers than calling them on the phone.

Methodology

The study compared responses from two surveys: a telephone survey with 2999 participants and a face-to-face survey with 2893 participants.

Potential Biases

Respondents who were socioeconomically disadvantaged were less likely to report their parents' education.

Limitations

The study only examined parents' education as indicators of early life socioeconomic position, which may not capture the full picture.

Participant Demographics

Participants were South Australians aged 18 and over, with a mix of socioeconomic backgrounds.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2288-8-54

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication